Where to start… where to start….? 🤯

The OG is up +6% today, but look at that weekly candlestick. Somewhere in the world there is a candlestick fanatic screaming like he just pulled and alpha Black Lotus from a first edition Magic The Gathering pack. Why? Because that is one hell of a nice looking Bullish Engulfing candlestick.

There’s a couple more days until it resolves. But hey, it still looks nice. 👀

SOL is boomin’ today, +12%! But I’m calling your attention to SOL’s daily chart because there are a boat load of other altcoins with similar setups. What makes them different than Solana’s is that Solana has broken out - the others have not.

$XLM ( ▲ 4.97% ), $STX ( ▲ 14.89% ), $RSR ( ▲ 10.27% ). and $HBAR ( ▲ 5.89% ) are just some of the altcoin charts that have some variant of a bull flag on their daily charts, but haven’t broken out yet. ⌚

And then you’ve got things like $NEAR ( ▲ 22.67% ). Look at the monthly candle so far. +92%. It’s at a 20 month high. If September 2026 were to close today, this would be the best performing month for NEAR since December 2023. From an Ichimoku perspective, resistance doesn’t show up until the monthly Kijun-Sen at $4.54.

Privacy seems to be a theme here. Zcash hit new all-time highs at $1.5k, we just saw NEAR popping, it’s hard to forget about the guy who used to be the only major player in the privacy coin space: $XMR ( ▲ 12.46% ). Just look at the 3-month candlestick chart.

No indicators. Just the candles. That just looks like it’s about to pop. It’s already up +88% for the quarter. This will be one to watch. 👀

The ‘Golden Cross’ is a technical analysis term for when the 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day moving average. We looked, at length, at $BTC ( ▲ 6.2% )’s 200-day EMA yesterday. We’re doing the same thing, but not nearly as long, at Bitcoin’s historical Golden Crosses. 👀

Bitcoin's 50-day average crossed above its 200-day on September 8 at $78,463. That's a golden cross, the 13th on record, and if history holds you've already been told it's bullish by someone with a laser-eyes avatar. So I pulled the other twelve.

For the test/analysis, I’m going with the premise that one would go long on the 50-day closing above the 200-day and then exit on the close below. Twelve instances, seven winners, five losers. The median made 12%.

Compounded, those twelve turned a dollar into $8,067. Sounds great until you check what holding did over the same stretch, which is $16,180. And two trades, February 2012 and October 2015, made 83% of the money. Take them out and the other ten compound to 4.6x over eleven years.

One year after a golden cross, the median return is 101%. One year after any random day since 2011, it's 90%. I drew twelve random days 10,000 times, and the dartboard beat the golden cross about four times in ten. And when I say I drew the random days, I mean four friends name G. E. Mini, G. Rock, C. Hat GPT, and a French foreign exchange student named Claude.

And ‘buying’ the Golden Cross is a late, late, late entry. By the time the cross prints, price is already up a median 55% off the low.

Seven completed crosses, four winners, median 11%. Compounded they made 4.4x. Holding made 9.3x. Same deal as the full history: about half. 🤷

Before 2020, days with a golden cross in effect compounded at roughly 300% a year, and days under a death cross lost 14% a year. Since 2020 it's 46% a year against 38%. Bitcoin has compounded at about the same rate under death crosses as under golden ones.

Which makes the exits expensive. Since 2020, selling the death cross and buying back the next golden cross got you back in at a higher price five times out of seven. All-time it's nine of thirteen. The four times it saved you were the four big bears. What it buys is a smaller hole: a worst drawdown of 57% since 2020 against 77% for holding. It's crop insurance, and the premium is half the crop.

So, here we are, number 13. It fired 36% off the June low, which is early by this signal's standards. Every loser on the list was dead inside six months, so the first useful thing this cross can tell anybody arrives around March 2027. 📆

This kind of like what I wrote about a couple days ago with the BONER/HIMS story, but this involves one of the biggest players in the RWA space, $INJ ( ▲ 17.48% ).

Injective’s INJ is now live on $SOL ( ▲ 12.14% ), which means StonkFun lets creators launch tokens paired directly with INJ. We’ve all seen versions of something like BTC/ETH, BTC/USDT, SOL/USDC - now add INJ as another base asset.

A new token can trade against crypto, stablecoins or tokenized exposure to traditional securities. If you’re an FX trader like me, then you might a little excited becuase this sounds a like like a type of cross-rate trading.

A token paired with INJ carries exposure to both assets. Pair it with tokenized SPY or NVDA and the relationship gets even more interesting. Traders have to think about relative performance instead of staring at another dollar-denominated chart.

Foreign exchange traders have dealt with this forever. Crypto, naturally, needed meme coins and tokenized Nvidia shares before discovering the same idea. 🧠

Citadel Securities handles more than 23% of U.S. equity market volume and roughly 35% of U.S.-listed retail volume. Its business is market making: stand between buyers and sellers, provide liquidity, collect the spread, repeat several billion times. 💸

The SEC may have introduced some new competition.

Yesterday, the SEC came out with this gem: SEC Issues “Innovation Exemption” to Facilitate the Trading of Tokenized NMS Stock and Request for Comment

Its new Innovation Exemption allows tokenized U.S. stocks to trade through automated market makers and liquidity pools. Qualifying venues receive temporary relief from the legal definition of an exchange, while certain firms supplying stock liquidity to those pools receive relief from the definition of a dealer.

The smart contracts must be public and deployed on a public, permissionless blockchain. The tokenized shares must carry the same rights as the underlying stock. Trading remains permissioned and subject to volume and listing limits.

Now, nobody is replacing Citadel next week. Or probably ever. Still, the SEC has approved a five-year experiment where software can perform part of the job traditionally handled by securities venues and professional market makers. 🤯

🌎 Celo Gives AI Agents Three Local Currencies To Spend

Celo’s x402 facilitator now supports Ripio’s wARS, wBRL, and wCOP, letting agents pay in Argentine pesos, Brazilian reais, and Colombian pesos without converting through dollars. Merchants can charge in the same currencies, trimming swap costs and FX exposure. wMXN, wCLP, and wPEN are next, assuming autonomous software develops a taste for regional budgeting. Celo.

🔐 COTI Brings Private AVAX And USDC To Avalanche

COTI’s Privacy-on-Demand system is live on Avalanche, letting applications run encrypted computations while their contracts and assets stay on the network. Its C-Chain Privacy Portal now supports private AVAX and USDC with selective disclosure for compliance. COTI claims Garbled Circuits are 3,000 times faster and 250 times lighter than alternatives. Avalanche.

🏛️ Injective Adds An SEC-Registered Transfer Agent

Injective Institutional Services is registered with the SEC as a transfer agent, letting it maintain securities ownership records and process changes. Injective calls itself the first Layer 1 ecosystem with this regulatory function, though the registered entity is an affiliate rather than the blockchain itself. A license is useful infrastructure; it is not a conveyor belt for tokenized assets. Injective.

🧺 1inch Lists Five AI Stock Baskets From Reserve

1inch now supports five Reserve DTFs on BNB Chain covering photonics, infrastructure, robotics, power, and cloud companies tied to the AI buildout. Each ERC-20 holds a market-cap-weighted basket of Ondo tokenized stocks with scheduled rebalancing and onchain redemption. Access excludes the US and UK. Damnit. 1inch.

🛠️ Cardano Hands Plutus To Its Fifth Specialist Team

Plutus and its engineering team move from IO Labs to Midgard Labs on October 1, spreading core Cardano development across more organizations. Midgard already audits Plutus contracts and contributes to Plinth, Plutarch, Aiken, and the CIP process. It becomes the fifth specialist shop maintaining a major Cardano function, with IO Labs supporting the handoff. Cardano.

🗳️ ZetaChain Asks Holders To Move ZETA And Anuma To Solana

ZetaChain is asking holders to approve a 1:1 migration of ZETA into a native Solana token, with voting open from September 17 through 20. Approval would eventually wind down the ZetaChain L1 and bring Anuma’s 300,000-plus users and private AI memory system to Solana. Supply stays fixed, while exchange timing and future staking mechanics remain unfinished business. Zeta.

Email me, Jonathan Morgan, feedback; I’d love to hear from you. 📧
Follow me on Stocktwits 🫂 And Sponsor this newsletter 😎

Securities Disclaimer: STOCKTWITS IS NOT A TAX ADVISOR, BROKER, FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. THE SERVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE TAX, LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND NOTHING ON THE SERVICE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL, A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY SECURITY. Trading in such securities can result in immediate and substantial losses of the capital invested. You should only invest risk capital, and not capital required for other purposes. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. You should also consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Content is to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only and the Service does not provide investment advice for any individual. Stocktwits, its affiliates and partners specifically disclaim any and all liability or loss arising out of any action taken in reliance on Content, including but not limited to market value or other loss on the sale or purchase of any company, property, product, service, security, instrument, or any other matter. You understand that an investment in any security is subject to a number of risks, and that discussions of any security published on the Service will not contain a list or description of relevant risk factors. In addition, please note that some of the stocks about which Content is published on the Service have a low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float. Such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information. Read the full terms & conditions here. 🔍

Author Disclosure: The author of this newsletter holds positions in AVAX, ADA, PUDGY, WLD, NEAR, INJ, LTC, LINK, ZEC, XLM, and FET. 📋