• Cryptotwits
  • Posts
  • March Broke The Five-Month Losing Streak 👍️

March Broke The Five-Month Losing Streak 👍️

Even a butt ugly win is still a win, and we can take any win the market gives us.

Author

Jonathan Morgan
April 01, 2026

OVERVIEW

March Broke The Five-Month Losing Streak 👍️

Q1 2026: -20.8%. Third worst first quarter on record. March: +1.9%. First green candle in six months. One of these numbers is getting all the attention. It's the wrong one. 🤷

Today we run the damage assessment on both - what the quarterly candle says about where this market actually is, what March's structure tells us about what comes next, and why a 0.13 body ratio shouldn't be confused with a recovery. 🧠 

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
MARCH 2026 STRUCTURAL DAMAGE ASSESSMENT 📋️

  • Property: Total Crypto Market Cap - Monthly Chart

  • Period Under Review: March 2026

  • Inspector: Phil Gapdown, Sr. Structural Assessor, 31 Years Active

INITIAL WALKTHROUGH

Showed up on-site March 1st. Structure had been taking hits for five straight months. October through February. Cumulative damage approximately 40%. Owner insists "it's turning around." They always do.

Walked the March candle. Open at $2.28T. High of $2.57T. Low of $2.22T. Close at $2.32T. Did the math. That's +1.9%.

Owner very excited about the plus sign. I am not.

BODY INTEGRITY

Body ratio: 0.13.

I've condemned buildings with more structural conviction than this candle. Eighty-seven percent of the monthly range is wick. The real body - the part where buyers and sellers actually agreed on a direction - is 13% of the move. That's a rounding error with chart privileges.

The close sits 9.5% below the high. Only 4.5% above the low. Structure settled into its bottom third. I've seen this before. The building leans south and the owner calls it "character."

FORWARD OUTLOOK: APRIL HISTORY

I'll say this once because it's the one useful thing in this report.

April has historically been the month where repair crews show up. After damaged Marches, the numbers are hard to ignore:

  • Mar 2018: -40.6% -> Apr 2018: +58.9%

  • Mar 2020: -25.5% -> Apr 2020: +34.5%

  • Mar 2025: -4.3% -> Apr 2025: +10.3%

April was bullish 8 out of 13 times after March. 62%. The worst the damage, the stronger the April bounce tended to be. There's a seasonal repair pattern here. Whether it activates in 2026 depends on whether there's still a foundation worth building on.

I don't determine that. I just assess what's in front of me.

ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

Structure status: Standing. Barely.

Occupancy recommendation: Do not occupy.

STOCKTWITS UPDATE
🌍 CME Group futures are live on Stocktwits

Stocktwits has officially partnered with CME Group, the world’s leading derivatives marketplace, to integrate full futures data directly into your feed.

With futures, you have the power to react to global news, economic data, and overnight shifts in real-time: nearly 24 hours a day, six days a week.

What’s landing on your dashboard:

  • Full Suite Data: Prices & Charts for Equity Indexes ($ES, $NQ), Energy ($CL), Metals ($GC), Agriculture, and Crypto.

  • Interactive Future Charts: Technical analysis tools built for the 24/6 cycle.

  • Dedicated Cashtag Pages: Join the conversation on the most liquid markets in the world.

Whether you’re hedging a long-term portfolio or scalping the London session, you now have the professional-grade insights to do it.

Ready to trade? Our partners at Tradier are bringing an exclusive account offer for the Stocktwits community — open a futures account* and get one year of TradingView Essential + CME Group market data free.

TLDR: ⚡ Futures are officially here. We’ve partnered with CME Group to bring real-time quotes, streaming prices, and interactive charts for the entire futures suite to Stocktwits. Plus, Tradier is offering a special account bonus to get you started. Explore Futures Now.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Q2 STRUCTURAL DAMAGE ASSESSMENT 📋️

  • Property: Total Crypto Market Cap - Quarterly Chart

  • Period Under Review: Q1 2026 (January - March)

  • Inspector: Phil Gapdown, Sr. Structural Assessor, 31 Years Active

INITIAL WALKTHROUGH

Got the call in early January. Owner said the property had "some wear and tear from Q4." Q4 2025 was -23.8%. That's a load-bearing wall missing.

Spent the full quarter on-site. Ninety days. Watched it happen in real time.

Open: $2.93T. High: $3.29T. Low: $2.05T. Close: $2.32T.

That's -20.8%. Third worst Q1 on record. I've filed two worse. Q1 2018 at -55.9% was a total structural loss. Q1 2015 at -22.0% was severe progressive failure. This one's keeping that company. I don't like the company it's keeping.

IMPACT ZONE

Intra-quarter range: 60.3%. High of $3.29T to low of $2.05T. That's $1.24 trillion in total displacement. Not a crack. Not a tremor. Sustained seismic event over ninety days.

Structure pushed up to $3.29T early in the quarter. I saw that. Noted it. Then watched it spend the next ten weeks walking downstairs.

Close: 29.3% below the high. 13.3% above the low. Final settlement was in the bottom quarter of the range.

Body ratio: 0.49. Half this candle is real body. That means the failure wasn't a wick event - no flash crash, no shakeout, no "it happened fast." This was slow. Methodical. The kind of failure where you can hear the beams creaking for weeks before anything gives.

I've seen fast collapses. Those are easier. This kind - the slow walk down - this is the one that tells you the foundation has a problem. And it feels much, much worse.

PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS

The structure was already compromised before Q1 started. This is important. I note it because ownership tends to blame the current quarter like it happened in a vacuum.

Q4 2025: -23.8%. Q1 2026: -20.8%.

That's back-to-back quarterly failures. Roughly -40% across six months. I've seen this pattern twice.

  • Case 1: Q4 2014 (-16.1%) -> Q1 2015 (-22.0%)

  • Case 2: Q4 2017 (+303.1%) -> Q1 2018 (-55.9%)

Current case maps to Case 1. Just a building that keeps losing floors and nobody's figured out where the bottom is.

Q1 STRUCTURAL FAILURE RATE

I've filed thirteen Q1 assessments. Only five came back bullish. That's a 38% pass rate. Worst of any quarter.

Average Q1 return on paper: +11.3%. Misleading. That average is carried entirely by Q1 2021 (+139.9%) and Q1 2024 (+63.1%). Those two were structurally sound. Strip them out and Q1 averages somewhere around break-even to negative.

Q1 is when the market finds out if the prior year built something real or just piled leverage on top of momentum. Most years, it's the second one..

FORWARD ASSESSMENT: Q2 REPAIR PROBABILITY

I don't do predictions. I do pattern recognition. Here's the pattern.

Seven prior bearish Q1s on record. Five of the seven saw a bullish Q2. That's 71%.

  • Q1 2014: -16.8% -> Q2: +45.5%. Major repair.

  • Q1 2015: -22.0% -> Q2: +10.2%. Partial. Slow.

  • Q1 2016: -0.6% -> Q2: +66.2%. Full restoration. Overbuilt, frankly.

  • Q1 2020: -4.4% -> Q2: +47.6%. Major repair.

  • Q1 2025: -17.5% -> Q2: +24.3%. Partial repair.

71% base rate for repair. 29% chance there's something underneath this building that I haven't found yet. I assess what I can see. I can't assess what's buried.

ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

  • Severity: Third worst Q1 on record.

  • Mechanism: Progressive failure. Sustained over 90 days. Not acute.

  • Pre-existing damage: Significant. Q4 2025 removed -23.8% of structural capacity before Q1 began.

  • Closest historical comparable: Q1 2015. Grinding bear. Progressive. Slow to repair.

  • Q2 repair probability: 71% base rate.

  • Occupancy recommendation: Absolutely not.

Notes: I've been doing this thirty-one years. When a building loses 40% across two quarters, drops to the bottom of its range, and the owner asks me if it's safe to move back in - I say the same thing every time: Something is wrong with you.

STOCKTWITS
Latest Stocktwits Podcasts & Videos 😱

Get In Touch 📬

Email me, Jonathan Morgan, feedback; I’d love to hear from you. 📧
Follow me on Stocktwits 🫂 And Sponsor this newsletter 😎 

How Was Cryptotwits Today?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Terms & Conditions 📝

Securities Disclaimer: STOCKTWITS IS NOT A TAX ADVISOR, BROKER, FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. THE SERVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE TAX, LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND NOTHING ON THE SERVICE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL, A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY SECURITY. Trading in such securities can result in immediate and substantial losses of the capital invested. You should only invest risk capital, and not capital required for other purposes. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. You should also consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Content is to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only and the Service does not provide investment advice for any individual. Stocktwits, its affiliates and partners specifically disclaim any and all liability or loss arising out of any action taken in reliance on Content, including but not limited to market value or other loss on the sale or purchase of any company, property, product, service, security, instrument, or any other matter. You understand that an investment in any security is subject to a number of risks, and that discussions of any security published on the Service will not contain a list or description of relevant risk factors. In addition, please note that some of the stocks about which Content is published on the Service have a low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float. Such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information. Read the full terms & conditions here. 🔍

Author Disclosure: The author of this newsletter holds positions in AVAX, ADA, PUDGY, WLD, NEAR, INJ, LTC, LINK, ZEC, XLM, and FET. 📋