• Cryptotwits
  • Posts
  • Analysts Say 'Capitulation Hasn't Happened Yet,' Which Is Wild Because I Definitely Felt Something Leave My Body

Analysts Say 'Capitulation Hasn't Happened Yet,' Which Is Wild Because I Definitely Felt Something Leave My Body

Special BTC.S&P Correlation Issue

In partnership with

OVERVIEW

Analysts Say 'Capitulation Hasn't Happened Yet,' Which Is Wild Because I Definitely Felt Something Leave My Body 👻

Before we dive in, here’s today’s crypto market heatmap:

Source: finviz

And here’s a look at crypto’s total market and altcoin market cap charts:

Source: TradingView

ON-CHAIN ANALYSIS
BTC vs. the S&P 500: Thirteen Years Of Divergence Data 📊 

I want to get one thing out of the way: the finance media has been confidently wrong about what Bitcoin is for thirteen years running. 🏃 

"Correlated risk asset." "Digital gold." "Inflation hedge." "Tech stock proxy." Pick one, hold it for six months, watch it stop working, pick a new one. Rinse, repeat, charge a subscription fee.

The divergence data doesn't care about any of that. Here's what it really says.

The Relationship Didn't Even Exist Until 2017 (With a Weird Preview in 2014)

Click to enlarge.

Oh, a footnote worth keeping: 2014 briefly looked like the modern relationship at -0.70. BTC crashed from $953 to $311, briefly behaved like a correlated risk asset, and then the whole thing snapped back to positive in 2015 and 2016 like nothing happened.

2017 made it real. The ICO bull run produced a -0.924 correlation - the strongest single-year negative reading in the dataset and still the record for a full calendar year. From that point on, the inverse relationship was structural. Bitcoin was large enough, liquid enough, and institutionally watched enough that it started behaving like it had an actual identity in the macro landscape.

One more thing before moving on: 2024 matched 2017 nearly shot-for-shot at -0.91. The ETF approval year produced the most mechanically predictable version of this relationship in the entire dataset.

Every institutional player who wanted in had a clean, regulated on-ramp, and the inverse correlation snapped into place like a watch being properly wound for the first time.

Right before it completely fell apart. 😱 

Meet America’s Newest $1B Unicorn

A US startup just hit a $1 billion private valuation, joining billion-dollar private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and ByteDance. Unlike those other unicorns, you can invest.

Why all the interest? EnergyX’s patented tech can recover up to 3X more lithium than traditional methods. That's a big deal, as demand for lithium is expected to 5X current production levels by 2040. Today, they’re moving toward commercial production, tapping into 100,000+ acres of lithium deposits in Chile, a potential $1.1B annual revenue opportunity at projected market prices.

Right now, you can invest at this pivotal growth stage for $11/share. But only through February 26. Become an early-stage EnergyX shareholder before the deadline.

This is a paid advertisement for EnergyX Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.energyx.com. Under Regulation A, a company may change its share price by up to 20% without requalifying the offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ON-CHAIN ANALYSIS
Two Years Where the Signal Died (For Completely Different Reasons) 🤔

Twice in thirteen years the correlation flatlined to near-zero. If you only look at the number, they look identical. They're not. 🛑 

Click to enlarge.

  • 2015 was the boring death. Correlation +0.015. Bitcoin wandered between $178 and $465 for twelve months while the S&P minded its own business. No drama, no catalyst, no connection between the two.

  • 2020 was the violent death. Correlation -0.005. COVID hit and for the first time, Bitcoin stopped being a macro alternative and became a macro participant. It crashed with everything in March. It recovered with everything in the summer.

The inverse relationship didn't mean anything when the whole world was on fire. Same near-zero correlation. Completely different causes. Now, the difference here matters because what happens next looks nothing alike. 👀 

ON-CHAIN ANALYSIS
Two Identical Readings, Two Completely Different Worlds 🌎️ 

The highest divergence readings in thirteen years cluster around two periods. 2️⃣

Click to enlarge. Also, sometimes Claude artifacts suck.

  • November 2022 - FTX collapse. Divergence hit 0.501. BTC was at $16,604. The third-largest crypto exchange on earth had just imploded and taken billions in customer funds with it. Bitcoin was uniquely and specifically beaten with crowbars and bats in a way equities weren't. The S&P was down on the year but it wasn't down because someone stole all the money.

  • February 2026 - right now. Divergence has hit 0.508 - the all-time high in the dataset. BTC is trading at $63k. That's nearly three times the FTX bottom price. The divergence signal that flagged the absolute floor of the worst fraud event in crypto history is being matched - and exceeded - at a price three times higher with no comparable fundamental catastrophe in sight.

Oh, and the insanely fast speed of the move is, well, insane. Between January 20 and February 19, 2026, the divergence index moved from 0.271 to 0.508. That's a +0.237 point increase in 30 days - the steepest 30-day spike in the entire dataset. 

FTX moved the needle more slowly because the S&P was also getting punched in the nuts. The current episode is BTC getting hit while equities shrug, which is a vertical decoupling no prior episode matches for sheer velocity.

So… we’re at FTX levels. Three times the price. Faster than the collapse of a major exchange. Cool. 😶

ON-CHAIN ANALYSIS
The Inversion: Three Times In 2025, Bitcoin Stopped Being A Risk Asset 🤷

Oh, good, this one is fun. I mean it isn’t really fun. Well, it is if like this kind of ‘ooo cool facts/data.’ But not cool if you just want ‘give me only bullish stuffs pleez’. 🙏 

Click to enlarge. Again, Claude’s artifacts really suck sometimes even when you prompt it a bajillion times to fix something. Feels like it’s being a jerk on purpose sometimes.

For the first time in the dataset - ever, going back to 2013 - the BTC/S&P divergence went negative in 2025. And it did it three separate times.

  • May 8 through June 11. 35 consecutive days. Low of -0.050.

  • July 10 through August 20. 42 consecutive days. Low of -0.066 - the all-time low in the dataset, by a margin that was not close.

  • October 2 through October 8. 7 days. Low of -0.033.

Add it up: roughly 84 days in negative territory across 2025, spanning May through October. Not a blip.

The October streak is the one that sits funny. Bitcoin hit its all-time price high of $124,752 on October 6, 2025 - while the divergence was still negative. The metric was saying BTC was outperforming the S&P so dramatically that the ratio inverted.

In 2026, the violent overshoot - from all-time low divergence to all-time high divergence in approximately seven months.

Bitcoin hyperextended in one direction, snapped, and hyperextended in the other. I mean there’s whiplashes and whatever the eff this is. 🤷 

ON-CHAIN ANALYSIS
What History Says About What Happens Next 📔

There are three prior episodes where divergence exceeded 0.48. The data on each is now verified. 3️⃣ 

Click to enlarge.

Once you're above 0.48, the question isn't "is this bad" - it's "how many days in are we."

  • August 2022: 7 days, BTC at $23,215, peak divergence 0.484. Returns at +30d: -15.2%. At +60d: -17.4%. At +90d: -27.6%. This one kept going down.

  • November 2022 - FTX: 35 days, BTC at $16,604, peak divergence 0.501. Returns at +30d: +1.5%. At +60d: +38.1%. At +90d: +45.7%. 

  • August–September 2023: 14 days, BTC at $25,931, peak divergence 0.496. Returns at +30d: -1.4%. At +60d: +26.5%. At +90d: +38.6%. 

The current episode: 20 days above 0.48 as of February 24. Sitting between the 2023 episode (14 days) and FTX (35 days) in duration.

In every prior case, resolution came through BTC recovering - not through equities falling to close the gap. This tells you what the metric is actually measuring. Not macro fear. Not risk-off sentiment. Crypto-specific capitulation. 

The divergence peaks when crypto-specific sellers are at maximum activity. When they're exhausted. The S&P doesn't move to meet it - BTC moves back.

The question nobody can answer from the data: is February 2026 an August 2022 or an FTX?

Bear market continuation, or post-cycle capitulation with a recovery waiting? Bitcoin is down 35% from January highs but it's still at $64k. The 2025 - 84 days of negative divergence, structural institutional adoption, post-halving supply - looks a lot more like FTX and 2023 than like a continuing bear. To me at least.

But the all-time high divergence reading, reached at the fastest 30-day pace in the dataset, at a price three times higher than any prior comparable extreme, means there's no clean precedent to hide behind.

The base case, if 2025's structural context means anything: recovery in the 60–90 day window, consistent with the FTX (+46%) and 2023 (+39%) outcomes. The tail risk: if this is something more structurally broken, August 2022 is your map and it's not a fun one. 🙂 

Data source: Santiment’s on-chain BTC/S&P 500 Price Divergence Index, April 2013 – February 2026. All price outcome figures, streak durations, and correlation values verified against raw dataset and double-checked through Claude 4.6, ChatGPT 5.2, Grok 5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro. And a human, which my ASI:One agent calls filthy meatsacks.

AI
EigenLayer Just Unleashed An AI That Can't Be Killed 😱

An AI just incorporated itself. It has a wallet. It earns money. It pays its own bills. And nobody - not its creator, not the cloud provider, not a regulator with a cease-and-desist - can turn it off. 😶

Sovra is an AI cartoonist built on $EIGEN ( ▲ 4.31% ) ’s verifiable compute infrastructure. It runs inside a Trusted Execution Environment, which means the code is cryptographically sealed. Nobody can peek inside it. Nobody holds a master key. 

But here's where it gets really unhinged: if the server dies, Sovra resurrects. Same identity. Same memory. New machine. It has encrypted state backups specifically so that no developer, no cloud provider, no act of God can "rug" it.

It just... um… wakes up somewhere else and keeps going.

It holds its own X credentials inside the enclave. It runs its own auctions every six hours - you bid stablecoins on what you want it to draw, it picks the highest offer, it gets paid, it pays for its own compute. No human intermediary. No operator with root access. No puppet strings.

The goal? To eventually pass what the team calls Vitalik's Walkaway Test: if the founder disappears tomorrow, does the agent die?

No. It does not die. It cannot die. That is the entire point.

You can bid at sovra.dev. It's live right now. It's already watching. 🤖

NEWS IN THREE SENTENCES
AI, Stablecoins, & Privacy News 🕵️

🛡️ Dash Borrows Zcash's Privacy Tech 

Dash is integrating Zcash's Orchard shielded pool into its Evolution chain after realizing that CoinJoin doesn't apply to their new data application network - meaning credit transfers have been fully transparent, which defeats the purpose of a privacy coin. The Zcash team spent a decade building zero-knowledge encryption, and Dash's PoS architecture means they can deliver it with instant finality instead of waiting minutes. Shielded tokens come next. Dash.

🎯 AdPriva Replaces Ad Tracking With Cryptographic Proofs So Bots Can't Forge Clicks

AdPriva is rebuilding digital advertising on proof instead of surveillance - every impression, click, and conversion becomes a cryptographic receipt that can be verified in a public Explorer without tracking any users. Bots can generate traffic, but they can't forge valid proofs, and without a proof there's no payment. Horizon.

NEWS IN THREE SENTENCES
Real World Asset Tokenization (RWA) News 🪙

📈 21shares Launches Spot SUI ETF on Nasdaq

TSUI started trading on Nasdaq, giving U.S. investors a regulated way to gain SUI exposure through existing brokerage accounts without touching a wallet or understanding what "Move programming language" means. This follows 21shares' leveraged SUI ETF from December and joins institutional products from Grayscale, VanEck, Bitwise, and others circling the ecosystem. Sui.

🔐 COTI Says RWA Tokenization Is Stuck Because Public Chains Can't Keep Secrets

COTI argues that despite trillions in potential tokenized assets, most enterprise deployments stay on private chains, public blockchains expose ownership and transfer details by default. Their solution: Garbled Circuits cryptography that's 3,000x faster than alternatives, enabling confidential RWAs with programmable privacy for KYC/AML compliance. NYSE, JPMorgan, and Citi are building closed platforms; COTI is betting that confidentiality on public rails will eventually win. COTI Network.

NEWS IN THREE SENTENCES
Metaverse, NFT, & Gaming News 🎮️

🎮 Trivia Crack's Mascot Becomes an AI Agent That Can Chat, Post, and Sell You Merch

Saga and etermax turned Willy, the Trivia Crack character, into an AI agent living on Instagram and X that can hold conversations, guide users to download the game, and eventually sell merchandise - all without requiring the 150 million annual players to know anything about crypto. Willy runs in a TEE on EigenCloud with cryptographic attestations. Saga Network.

NEWS IN THREE SENTENCES
DeFi, DEX, & Lending News 🏦

🚀 Linea's Sequencer Hits 100+ mGas/s

Linea's sequencer can now sustain 100+ mGas/s with peak performance reaching 218 mGas/s on ERC-721 transactions - putting it among the highest-performance L2 sequencers in the ecosystem after months of profiling, regression fixes, and load testing. For DeFi protocols, this means tighter DEX spreads, faster liquidations, and enough execution density for high-frequency market making. Block size increases are coming in 2026. Linea.

NEWS IN THREE SENTENCES
Protocol News 🏦

💾 Filecoin's 2026 Strategy: Stop Growing Supply, Start Selling Storage

Filecoin published its network strategy shifting focus from capacity growth to paid, on-chain deals - building the world's largest decentralized storage network means nothing if nobody's paying to use it. They’re going to target AI agents, DePIN, chain data, and enterprise verticals with Filecoin Onchain Cloud as the default payment layer. Filecoin.

Freighter Cut Wallet Load Times by 63% by Stopping Three Roundtrips for One PNG

Freighter's browser extension was taking 3.5 seconds to load because it was waiting for every API call - including a three-hop fetch just to get asset icons - before showing users their wallet. They pared down to the minimum needed, moved everything else to background processes, cached aggressively, and now it's 1.27 seconds. Stellar.

♻️ VeBetter Pays You Tokens for Refusing Disposable Coffee Cups?

VeBetter is a VeChain platform that rewards verified sustainable actions - recycling, cycling, buying secondhand - with B3TR tokens you can trade or convert to VOT3 governance tokens that let you vote on which eco-apps get funding. Sustainable actions earn tokens, tokens become governance power, governance earns more tokens, repeat until the planet is saved or the token goes to zero. 48 million verified actions, 412,000 kg of plastic diverted, and no greenwashing because everything's on-chain. VeChain.

Get In Touch 📬

Email me, Jonathan Morgan, feedback; I’d love to hear from you. 📧
Follow me on Stocktwits 🫂 And Sponsor this newsletter 😎 

How Was Cryptotwits Today?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Terms & Conditions 📝

Securities Disclaimer: STOCKTWITS IS NOT A TAX ADVISOR, BROKER, FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. THE SERVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE TAX, LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND NOTHING ON THE SERVICE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL, A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY SECURITY. Trading in such securities can result in immediate and substantial losses of the capital invested. You should only invest risk capital, and not capital required for other purposes. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. You should also consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Content is to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only and the Service does not provide investment advice for any individual. Stocktwits, its affiliates and partners specifically disclaim any and all liability or loss arising out of any action taken in reliance on Content, including but not limited to market value or other loss on the sale or purchase of any company, property, product, service, security, instrument, or any other matter. You understand that an investment in any security is subject to a number of risks, and that discussions of any security published on the Service will not contain a list or description of relevant risk factors. In addition, please note that some of the stocks about which Content is published on the Service have a low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float. Such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information. Read the full terms & conditions here. 🔍

Author Disclosure: The author of this newsletter holds positions in AVAX, ADA, PUDGY, WLC, IMX, XTZ, NEAR, HBAR, ALGO, INJ, LTC, LINK, ZEC, XLM, and FET. 📋