The Fed is expected to hold interest rates where they are tomorrow. Every forecaster, betting market, and expert on the street has it as a hold. 👀

And I get questions/emails about doing a little deep dive into how crypto responds to interest rate decisions. So I pulled every FOMC decision since March 2014 - 102 of them, 21 hikes, 70 holds, 11 cuts - and lined them up against the total crypto market cap daily chart.

Then I sent the whole thing through an audit pass and an hourly pass and a what-else-is-in-here pass, because if I'm going to tell you the Fed doesn't move crypto I'd like to not be wrong about it.

The short version: the decision day is a coin flip. The slightly bigger event already happened two weeks ago when CPI printed. And the thing readers have been taught to want - the cut - has been the worst thing to be long into for seven years running. There is one useful read buried in the hourly data, and it's at the end, so you have to sit through the rest. 🍿

Every cycle, projects rise on hype and disappear just as quickly. What lasts is something much harder to build: people who stay when timelines are quiet and prices are flat.

Long-term communities are forged during drawdowns, delays, and slow markets. When attention moves elsewhere, the real foundation gets laid.

Floki and TokenFi continue to bring together builders, users, and holders who care less about short-term noise and more about direction.

That commitment also connects holders to opportunities across the ecosystem. Through the RICE AI partnership, eligible FLOKI and TOKEN holders and stakers have received $RICE airdrops as part of an 8 round distribution, giving the community a stake in a partner project's journey.

That kind of alignment compounds over time.

Cycles come and go. Products evolve. Markets reset.

Communities that survive those resets help shape what comes next.

*3rd Party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Stocktwits. See disclosure here.

Take every decision, hike or hold or cut, and ask one question: was total crypto market cap higher at the close than it was the day before? Yes 54% of the time. A random day in the same sample: also 54%. Split it by what the Fed did and the hit rate lands between 48% and 56%. 🤷

Median high-to-low range on decision day is 5.4% against 5.0% for an ordinary Wednesday. Hike days run 6.8%, though that's 21 days mostly stacked in the 2022 high-vol regime. More range, no direction. The market spends the afternoon doing a big dramatic Jack Sparrow run down the dock and ends up roughly where it started.

The direction only shows up a week to a month out, and when it does it's upside down from the story people carry around. 🙃

Of the 11 rate cuts since 2019, total crypto market cap was higher 30 days later exactly three times. Median move a month after a cut: -6.2%. A week after: -3.6%. The cut is supposed to be the thing we're all waiting for. It has been, with great consistency, the thing to not be long on. 📉

And how bad were the bad ones? Pretty bad, go look. The three 2019 cuts - July, September, October - printed -6%, -19% and -17% a month out. The March 3, 2020 emergency 50bp was -25% in 30 days, because the next three weeks were the Covid crash.

The December 2024 cut, the one Powell delivered with a frown and a dot plot that took two cuts off the table, dropped 4.6% in the four hours after the statement and 9.7% by the next close. Then 2025 served up three cuts in a row, September through December, and a month after each one the market was down 11%, 18% and 2%.

The reason is dull and old. The Fed cuts because something is breaking, and crypto trades the something. Nobody watches fire trucks pull up next door and decides it's a great night for property values.

Eleven cuts is a small sample, and it's weighted to two bad stretches, 2019-20 and 2024-25. I'm not telling you cuts are bearish forever. I'm telling you that every time someone has bought the cut in your adult life, it has not gone well, and you should at least know that before the next one. ⚠️

From 2022 through 2025, the median high-to-low range on a CPI release day was 5.5%. On an FOMC decision day it was 4.3%. On a day with nothing scheduled, 3.8%. So CPI days swing wider. They just don't travel much farther. Run the two-day move (release or decision day plus the next) and FOMC comes in at 2.15% against 2.35% for a random Wednesday - a statistical wash. 📊

Which makes sense once you see the other number. Since December 2022, 31 decisions have come with a consensus forecast attached. Thirty of them matched it. The one miss was September 2024, when the Fed went 50 instead of 25. Thirty of 31. The decision-day hit rate on those thirty fully-priced meetings was 47%.

The market already knew the number by the time Powell (or, since June, Warsh) read it, so what it is reacting to on Fed day is the dot plot and whatever face he made at the podium.

That's by design. Powell's Fed hated surprising anybody - the statement told you which way policy was leaning, and Fed speakers spent the weeks before each meeting walking the market to the number. Warsh thinks all that hand-holding helped make the Fed late on inflation in 2021-22, so at his first meeting in June he cut the statement roughly in half and pulled the forward-guidance line out of it.

He also skipped turning in his own dot. So far it hasn't made him any harder to call: June, July and the September hike all landed right on consensus.

But if there is a Fed effect in crypto at all, it lives in the projections and the presser, not in the rate. 🖖

On the daily chart, nothing works. Buying the FOMC dip - going long after a red decision day - has returned -1.4% over the following week against +0.35% after any random red day. 🙈

Chasing a green decision day is no better (+0.1% at a week vs +1.3% baseline). Reversal rates at one and seven days match coin flips. No fade, no follow-through, no edge. I checked for pre-meeting drift and pre-meeting volatility compression too, because that's a real thing in equities. In crypto it isn't: the week into the Fed is +0.5% with a 55% hit rate, identical to any other week, and the range on the day before is 0.87x its 20-day average versus 0.86x for an ordinary day.

But the hourly data shows something different. TradingView’s 4-hour and 1-hour history is limited to January 2024 and January 2026, respectively, so this is 22 meetings and six meetings, and you should hold it loosely. But: the 4-hour bar that holds the 2pm statement has picked the direction for the next 24 hours in 15 of 22 meetings. When that bar closed up (10 cases), the median move a day later was +2.1%. When it closed down (12 cases), -2.1%.

The 2:30 presser, meanwhile, is just noise.

So the read for Wednesday afternoon is not the number. It's the color of the first candle after 2pm. That candle is the Sorting Hat - it yells Gryffindor red or Slytherin green, and the next 24 hours go live in that house.

Bulls probably want to see that bar close green before they get interested in anything, and if it closes red and the presser can't undo it, bears get the next day with the wind at their back.

Cuts, once again, are the exception. The six cuts since 2024 print a positive median knee-jerk in the statement bar (+0.5%) that is gone by the next day (-0.7%). Holds stick, the one hike stuck, cuts reverse. 🎥

Seven straight FOMC meetings closed red on the daily bar from October 2025 through July 2026. Two 7-green runs ended in September 2019 and December 2020. Before anyone builds a thesis on that: the odds of some run of seven or more showing up in 102 near-coin-flips is 59%. Green after green happens 56% of the time, green after red 53%. A red Fed day tells you nothing about the next one. Casinos hang a screen over the roulette wheel showing the last dozen spins for the same reason they don't hang clocks. 🔴

So here's the plan. The market believes there will be no hike or cut (88% chance of no hike or cut). The dot plot isn't due until December. At 2pm the only thing worth watching is whether the first candle closes above or below where it opened, and by 3:30 whether Warsh managed to flip it. After that, go back to watching the things that have moved this market in 2026, none of which sit in the Eccles Building (that’s where the Fed is, FYI). 🔬

Email me, Jonathan Morgan, feedback; I’d love to hear from you. 📧
Follow me on Stocktwits 🫂 And Sponsor this newsletter 😎

Securities Disclaimer: STOCKTWITS IS NOT A TAX ADVISOR, BROKER, FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. THE SERVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE TAX, LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND NOTHING ON THE SERVICE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL, A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY SECURITY. Trading in such securities can result in immediate and substantial losses of the capital invested. You should only invest risk capital, and not capital required for other purposes. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. You should also consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Content is to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only and the Service does not provide investment advice for any individual. Stocktwits, its affiliates and partners specifically disclaim any and all liability or loss arising out of any action taken in reliance on Content, including but not limited to market value or other loss on the sale or purchase of any company, property, product, service, security, instrument, or any other matter. You understand that an investment in any security is subject to a number of risks, and that discussions of any security published on the Service will not contain a list or description of relevant risk factors. In addition, please note that some of the stocks about which Content is published on the Service have a low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float. Such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information. Read the full terms & conditions here. 🔍

Author Disclosure: The author of this newsletter holds positions in AVAX, ADA, PUDGY, WLD, NEAR, INJ, LTC, LINK, ZEC, XLM, and FET. 📋