Polymarket puts the probability of the CLARITY Act being signed into law in 2026 at 28% in today’s snapshot, up from 14% on September 1.

Washington has lowered expectations enough that “probably screwed” qualifies as momentum.

The next test is scheduled for tomorrow (Tuesday, September 15), at 2:15 p.m. ET: a Senate cloture vote on the motion to proceed. That requires 60 votes to clear a procedural hurdle toward considering the bill. Passing this vote would still leave more steps before enactment.

Yes, we’re watching a vote about getting to the part where they consider the thing.

Also, Kalshi’s snapshot shows:

There were some language changes/additions made today that meet the 126 demands from Democrats before the cloture vote tomorrow, and this post from Senator Lumis:

That’s one reason why crypto is pamping. But who the hell knows. 🙅

The UAE’s national identity platform serves 12.5 million people, and $AVAX ( ▲ 4.69% ) has been selected to help handle the paperwork. TDRA, the country’s digital government authority, is upgrading the blockchain beneath the UAEPASS Digital Vault to Avalanche.

UAEPASS already connects:

The Digital Vault lets users request, hold, and share official documents. Receiving institutions can check the issuer instead of treating every certificate like evidence in a cold case.

The vault already uses blockchain. Avalanche’s job is upgrading it and supporting it as demand grows. Those 12.5 million people are UAEPASS users, for clarity.

According to Avalanche, a dedicated L1 gives the operator control over network membership and configuration, plus dedicated capacity for the service. Millions of people need their documents processed. 📰

HashPack and SODAX are building $HOOD ( ▲ 1.56% ) stock-token access on $HBAR ( ▲ 3.66% ), with purchases funded by HBAR or USDC. The goal is to buy stock exposure from the wallet you already use. SODAX handles the execution and liquidity across networks. HashPack handles the interface.

Once live, eligible users should be able to:

The integration is still being built. And Robinhood’s tokens are tokenized debt securities providing economic exposure, without ownership rights in the underlying companies. So… a CFD? It sounds like a CFD. Anyways, because this is something cool, naturally those of us in the U.S. are excluded. 😡

For most of DeFi’s existence, liquidity has had a single address. You deposit tokens into liquidity pools (LP) on $UNI ( ▲ 6.82% ) , $CRV ( ▲ 0.49% ), $BAL ( ▲ 2.28% ) or wherever, and that capital belongs to that venue until you move it somewhere else. 😠

Want it working somewhere new? Withdraw. Redeploy. Pay gas. Do the whole thing again.

1inch deserves some credit for pointing out where this may be heading next.

With Aqua, makers can keep tokens in their wallets until an trade happens. The same inventory can sit behind multiple strategies, Pathfinder can find it, and 1inch resolvers can tap it when there’s a swap worth filling.

The names are different elsewhere. $COW ( ▲ 0.56% ) has solvers. UniswapX has fillers. 1inch has resolvers. This might not sound like a big deal - but if you’re like me and have spent a boat load of time involved in different LPs, this is a stupidly awesome development. It’s one of those things that makes you go, ‘why wasn’t this a thing before?’

Liquidity is becoming less tied to a specific platform while execution gets handed to competing networks of professional market makers and automated systems. That changes the DEX fight.

For years, TVL was treated like the scoreboard. More deposits. More liquidity. Bigger protocol. But if $1 of capital can stay in a wallet, support multiple strategies and get pulled into whichever execution path needs it, locking up the biggest pile of tokens starts looking less impressive.

The better question becomes: who can find liquidity, price it and execute against it best?

A lot less sexy than another 10,000% APY farm and definitely a lot more important. 🧠

BSC’s new block-building system averaged 28% more gas per block than the old version after the Pasteur upgrade. The improvement comes from removing a job validators were repeating before they sealed the block. 🟩

Anyone who has attended a meeting to prepare for another meeting understands the potential savings.

Pasteur went live August 25. The new process lets builders submit blocks they have already executed. Validators skip the duplicate execution before sealing, leaving builders more time to pack transactions.

The 28% figure compares the 2 methods under live traffic. It doesn’t establish a matching reduction in fees. 🤦

Email me, Jonathan Morgan, feedback; I’d love to hear from you. 📧
Follow me on Stocktwits 🫂 And Sponsor this newsletter 😎

Securities Disclaimer: STOCKTWITS IS NOT A TAX ADVISOR, BROKER, FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. THE SERVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE TAX, LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND NOTHING ON THE SERVICE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL, A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY SECURITY. Trading in such securities can result in immediate and substantial losses of the capital invested. You should only invest risk capital, and not capital required for other purposes. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. You should also consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Content is to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only and the Service does not provide investment advice for any individual. Stocktwits, its affiliates and partners specifically disclaim any and all liability or loss arising out of any action taken in reliance on Content, including but not limited to market value or other loss on the sale or purchase of any company, property, product, service, security, instrument, or any other matter. You understand that an investment in any security is subject to a number of risks, and that discussions of any security published on the Service will not contain a list or description of relevant risk factors. In addition, please note that some of the stocks about which Content is published on the Service have a low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float. Such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information. Read the full terms & conditions here. 🔍

Author Disclosure: The author of this newsletter holds positions in AVAX, ADA, BTC, PUDGY, WLD, NEAR, LINK, ZEC, XLM.. 📋